Case 1802449/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Applegate v R1: A List Dentistry R2: Genix Healthcare Ltd R3: Mustafa Tariq Mohammed — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802449/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Applegate
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge JM Wade determined that Miss F Applegate’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded against the first respondent, A List Dentistry. The tribunal found that £559.72 had been recorded on a payslip as paid but had not in fact been paid, and ordered the first respondent to pay that net sum.
The judgment also states that all other claims were dismissed because they were not pursued. No separate breakdown of any other claim types or remedies is given in the extracted text, and no additional monetary award beyond the £559.72 wage deduction was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the first respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £559.72. The judgment states that the amount had been recorded on a payslip as paid but was not actually paid. | Upheld | — | £560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £560
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.