Case 1802451/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Kaur v Santander UK plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802451/2019
- Decision date
- 16 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew complaints of whistleblowing dismissal, whistleblowing detriment, sexual orientation discrimination, and religion or belief discrimination. Those complaints were dismissed following the withdrawal.
The judgment also records that the claimant's remaining complaints would proceed to a hearing on 25 to 27 November 2019. It does not identify those remaining complaints or determine any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the complaint of whistleblowing dismissal was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the complaint of whistleblowing detriment was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of sexual orientation discrimination was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of religion or belief discrimination was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.