Case 1802463/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Alexander Hirst v Snowdon Transport Limited TELEPHONE HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802463/2020
- Decision date
- 24 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Appearances
- Venue
- By telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Alexander Hirst
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAlexander Hirst was employed by Snowdon Transport Limited as a Class 1 driver from 3 February 2020 to 6 March 2020. He claimed £1,579.99 for unpaid wages and holiday pay. The respondent said it had a contractual entitlement to deduct that sum because of the claimant's alleged unreasonable carelessness or neglect, said to arise from events on 6 March 2020 when he did not wait for a mechanic to attend the truck and caused the respondent costs for agency cover, fuel and trailer hire.
The tribunal identified the central issue as whether the claimant had acted with unreasonable carelessness or neglect so as to permit the deduction under the employment contract. It heard evidence from the claimant and from the respondent's operations manager, Mr Matthew Ahmed, and considered documentary material including text messages. The tribunal accepted the claimant's account that he reported the vehicle fault to his line manager Derek, was told to contact Martello, and then communicated with Martello and Derek by telephone and text.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been instructed to return north once he had got the vehicle fixed. It accepted that there was no direct evidence from Derek or anyone from Martello to contradict the claimant's account of the instructions he received. On that basis, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant acted with unreasonable carelessness or neglect on 6 March 2020, and it held that the respondent was not entitled to make the deduction from wages.
The claim for unlawful deductions therefore succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,579.99 within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unlawful deductions and records that the sum claimed was £1,579.99 for unpaid wages and holiday pay. No separate award was made for any distinct holiday pay claim. | Upheld | — | £1,580 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,580
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.