Case 1802464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Isaacs v Fitness Connection 1079 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802464/2020
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Isaacs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr A Isaacs's unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37. The reasons recorded that, in an order with reasons sent to the parties on 6 July 2020, the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit as a condition of pursuing the unfair dismissal complaint, which was identified in the reasons as a protected disclosure complaint.
The deposit was not paid, so the unfair dismissal claim was struck out. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims of holiday pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and wrongful dismissal remained listed for a later hearing on 3 December 2020, with the hearing length reduced by one day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit as a condition of pursuing it, and the deposit was not paid. The reasons describe the complaint as an unfair dismissal complaint concerning protected disclosure. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.