Case 1802489/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Racz v Transdev Blazefield Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802489/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Racz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Racz brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Transdev Blazefield Ltd and Harrogate & District Travel Ltd t/a The Harrogate Bus Company. The matter was heard at Leeds on 27 September 2022 before Employment Judge Maidment, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was submitted outside the applicable time limits. It further found that it could not conclude that it had not been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been submitted in time.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim and stated that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. No compensation or other monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint was submitted outside the applicable time limits and could not conclude that it had not been reasonably practicable for the claim to have been submitted in time. It therefore struck out the claim for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.