Case 1802501/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S A Gledhill v Fresh Pastures Limited Heard by CVP: 15 November 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802501/2021
- Decision date
- 3 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. S A Gledhill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr. S A Gledhill, brought two complaints against Fresh Pastures Limited. The first was an alleged protected disclosure detriment arising from an incident on 1 February 2021, when the new night manager, Richard, asked the claimant to drive a van. The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.
The second complaint was unlawful deduction of wages, said to concern bonus payments on 13 October 2020, 8 December 2020 and 9 February 2021. The tribunal concluded that this complaint had no reasonable prospects of success and struck it out. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The alleged protected disclosure detriment concerning the 1 February 2021 request by the new night manager, Richard, that the claimant drive a van was withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment also states it is dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint concerned alleged deductions from bonus payments on 13 October 2020, 8 December 2020 and 9 February 2021. The tribunal struck it out because it had no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.