Case 1802521/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bilal v ZA Enterprise — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802521/2021
- Decision date
- 3 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bilal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 July 2021, the Tribunal gave Mr M Bilal an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal identified two grounds for possible strike out: non-compliance with Tribunal orders and failure to respond to the strike-out warning, and the claim having not been actively pursued.
Mr Bilal did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 18 August 2021 was vacated and did not take place.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or any monetary award. It is a procedural strike-out decision only, issued by Employment Judge Maidment on 3 August 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons do not specify the underlying pleaded claim type; this classification follows the public listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons do not specify the underlying pleaded claim type; this classification follows the public listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.