Case 1802532/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C. Wilson v I Care Solutions Wakefield Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802532/2021
- Decision date
- 16 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.Smith Representation
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C. Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 July 2021 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent, the tribunal found that Mrs C. Wilson's complaint of non-payment of holiday pay was well-founded. It ordered the respondent, I Care Solutions Wakefield Limited, to pay £290.85.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from wages. This comprised £120 from the last pay paid into her bank and £113.40 for non-payment of training days, making a total award of £233.40. It further upheld the claimant's breach of contract complaint in relation to non-payment of petrol expenses and ordered payment of £200.00.
The tribunal recorded that the total sum payable forthwith was £724.25. The claimant's complaint of non-payment of SSP was not well-founded and was dismissed because the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon it.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint of non-payment of holiday pay was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £291 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unlawful deductions from wages covered £120 from the last pay paid into bank and non-payment of training days totalling £113.40. | Upheld | — | £233 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint of non-payment of petrol expenses was found well-founded. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Other | Complaint of non-payment of SSP was dismissed because the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon that complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £724
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.