Case 1802540/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Hussain v 1 TTEC (UK) Solutions Ltd Respondent: 2 Mr P Wilkinson Respondent: 3 Mr S Emery Respondent: 4 Ms R Wood — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802540/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Hussain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 5 January 2024 before Employment Judge Rostant, the tribunal permitted the claimant to rely on the medical evidence produced on 7 December. It found that the claimant was a person with a disability at the material times complained of by reason of depression/anxiety.
The judgment also states that Mr P Wilkinson was dismissed from the proceedings as an individual respondent. The text provided does not set out any further merits determination or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal permitted the claimant to rely on the medical evidence produced on 7 December and found that she was a person with a disability by virtue of depression/anxiety at the material times complained of. The judgment also records that Mr P Wilkinson was dismissed from the proceedings as an individual respondent. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.