Case 1802541/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Johnson v Art Dental Studio Limited (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802541/2023
- Decision date
- 12 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Johnson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 12 December 2023 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' because it had not been actively pursued. The specific pleaded claim types are not identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.