Case 1802561/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Wingfield v East Hull Fisheries Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802561/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Wingfield
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds via CVP on 30 June 2021 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith. The claimant, Miss E Wingfield, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal first found that the claim form was lodged within time, or if it was not, that it was not reasonably practicable for it to be presented before the end of the relevant period and it was then presented within such further period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant forthwith £392.02.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim form was lodged within time, or alternatively that it was not reasonably practicable to present it before the end of the relevant period and it was presented within a reasonable further period. | Upheld | — | £392 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.