Case 1802563/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Abimbola v Global Banking School Ltd Heard by CVP – remote video hearing — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802563/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Abimbola
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP on 3 October 2023 before Employment Judge D N Jones. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had no reasonable prospect of success and was vexatious.
The reason given was that a written agreement dated 5 May 2023, entered into with the assistance of a conciliation officer, provided full and final settlement of these claims in paragraph 7(d). On that basis, the tribunal held that continuing with the claim was an abuse of process and vexatious.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out the claim on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospect of success and was vexatious. It found that the written agreement dated 5 May 2023, entered into with the assistance of a conciliation officer, included full and final settlement of these claims by paragraph 7(d), so pursuit of the claim was an abuse of process. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim on the grounds that it had no reasonable prospect of success and was vexatious. It found that the written agreement dated 5 May 2023, entered into with the assistance of a conciliation officer, included full and final settlement of these claims by paragraph 7(d), so pursuit of the claim was an abuse of process. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.