Case 1802564/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Mapranathukaran v Historic Hotels and Properties Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802564/2023
- Decision date
- 22 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Mapranathukaran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr J Mapranathukaran's unfair dismissal complaint against Historic Hotels and Properties Limited. It found that the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, so the compensatory award was increased by 20% under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also found that the claimant's blameworthy conduct caused or contributed to the dismissal, so the compensatory award was reduced by 30%, and the basic award was reduced by 30% because of his conduct before dismissal.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,398.20 and a compensatory award of £7,267.40. The judgment records that these are the actual sums payable after the uplift and reductions had been applied.
The tribunal also upheld the notice-pay complaint as a breach of contract claim and awarded £3,600 damages, calculated on gross pay because the tribunal considered the claimant was likely to have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. It further upheld the complaint that holiday taken but not paid for February 2023 amounted to an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,471.28 as the gross sum deducted.
The remaining wage and holiday complaints were dismissed. The claim for a £5,000 bonus payment on 31 August 2022 was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present it in time. The complaints about the bonus for the period ending April 2023 and wages for 13-18 February 2023 were dismissed as not well founded, and the complaint under regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 concerning accrued but untaken holiday was also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded. The tribunal increased the compensatory award by 20% for unreasonable non-compliance with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, then reduced the compensatory award by 30% for the claimant's blameworthy conduct and reduced the basic award by 30% for conduct before dismissal. Final awards were a basic award of £2,398.20 and a compensatory award of £7,267.40. | Upheld | — | £9,666 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint in breach of contract was well-founded. Damages were assessed at £3,600 gross to reflect the likelihood of tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday taken but not paid in respect of February 2023 was held to be an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,471.28, being the gross sum deducted; the claimant was to deal with tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,471 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint about a £5,000 bonus payment on 31 August 2022 was dismissed as out of time; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the complaint within the applicable time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,737
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,398
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,267
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.