Case 1802566/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Final Mile 2021 Ltd (previously GBA Final Mile Ltd)(in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802566/2021
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The proceedings were posted to the respondent at its operating address, no response was received by the return date, and Employment Judge JM Wade said there was sufficient information on the file to give judgment. The respondent was Final Mile 2021 Limited, previously GBA Final Mile Ltd, in creditors voluntary liquidation.
The claimant's complaints of entitlement to a redundancy payment and notice pay succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay gross sums of £6,930 for redundancy pay and £5,040 for notice pay. The judgment also stated that the claimant was to account for any tax and employee national insurance on those sums.
The tribunal recorded that interest would start to run after 14 days from the sending of the judgment. It also dealt with a 2021 holiday pay claim by stating that, unless the claimant sent a calculation of that holiday pay by 4pm on 9 August 2021, the claim would stand dismissed without further order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal awarded redundancy pay as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £6,930 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as a gross sum; interest was stated to run after 14 days from sending of the judgment. | Upheld | — | £5,040 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment said this claim would stand dismissed without further order unless the claimant sent a calculation of his 2021 holiday pay by 4pm on 9 August 2021. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,970
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.