Case 1802567/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Keith, Counsel For the v Mr S Ahmed, Director of Operations and Mr Abrar Rehman, Superintendent Pharmacist (bound by — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802567/2021
- Decision date
- 9 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Appearance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Keith, Counsel For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Shulman, heard by CVP on 30 June 2021. The judgment is headed "Judgment by Consent" and records that the respondent accepted it owed the claimant £9,210.00 collectively.
The sum was stated to be in respect of no notice pay, no holiday pay and unauthorised deduction of wages. The judgment does not allocate the amount between those heads of claim, and it does not contain findings on liability beyond the parties' consent position.
The tribunal ordered that the respondent pay the claimant £9,210.00 accordingly. No further remedy components, legal tests, or substantive reasons are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that £9,210.00 was owed collectively in respect of no notice pay, no holiday pay and unauthorised deduction of wages, and was ordered by consent. The judgment does not split the sum between the individual heads of claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that £9,210.00 was owed collectively in respect of no notice pay, no holiday pay and unauthorised deduction of wages, and was ordered by consent. The judgment does not split the sum between the individual heads of claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that £9,210.00 was owed collectively in respect of no notice pay, no holiday pay and unauthorised deduction of wages, and was ordered by consent. The judgment does not split the sum between the individual heads of claim. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,210
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.