Case 1802568/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Forte v Cherry Lane Retail Centres Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802568/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Forte
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 29 June 2021, Employment Judge Evans sat alone by telephone in Leeds. The Claimant, Miss E Forte, was represented by her father, Mr S Forte, and the Respondent by Ms Burchell, the in-house HR manager.
The judgment records that the Claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and sex discrimination were dismissed following their withdrawal by the Claimant at that hearing. No findings were made on the merits of any claim, and the judgment records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant at the preliminary hearing on 29 June 2021. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant at the preliminary hearing on 29 June 2021. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states this claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant at the preliminary hearing on 29 June 2021. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.