Case 1802573/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Acquah-Hayford and others (see attached schedule) v East Coast Main Line Company Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802573/2018
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr J Acquah-Hayford and others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims brought by Mr J Acquah-Hayford and the other listed claimants against East Coast Main Line Company Limited, London North Eastern Railway Limited, and Hitachi Rail Limited.
The reasons state that, by letter dated 27 February 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why their claims should not be struck out because they had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 15 September 2022 and because the claims had not been actively pursued. The claimants did not make written representations or request a hearing, and the Tribunal recorded that there was no evidence that they intended to pursue the claims. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claims' but does not identify the specific statutory or contractual cause of action in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.