Case 1802577/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Kidir v Wm Morrison Supermarkets Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802577/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Kidir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed all of the Claimant's claims against WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc pursuant to Rule 38(1) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The stated reason was that the Claimant had failed to comply with Case Management Orders 2(a) and (b), made during the Telephone Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 9 September 2021 and confirmed in orders sent to the parties on 13 September 2021. The hearing listed for 15 November 2021 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses all of the Claimant's claims under Rule 38(1). The specific claim type is identified from the listing category/context, as the judgment text itself does not separately enumerate the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses all of the Claimant's claims under Rule 38(1). The specific claim type is identified from the listing category/context, as the judgment text itself does not separately enumerate the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1) of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.