Case 1802581/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802581/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant confirmed that he brought no claim for notice pay. On that basis, the Tribunal dismissed the Respondent's Employer's Contract Claim because it had no jurisdiction to hear it.
The claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay were not finally determined. Their hearing was adjourned pending receipt of documentation from the Claimant about the identity of his employer and the Respondent's possible administration.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as the Respondent's Employer's Contract Claim and dismisses it for lack of jurisdiction after the Claimant confirmed he brought no claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unpaid wages was adjourned pending documentation about the identity of the employer and the Respondent's possible administration. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was adjourned pending documentation about the identity of the employer and the Respondent's possible administration. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.