Case 1802590/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms McGee (counsel) v Mr T Pochron (solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802590/2021
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms McGee (counsel)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C Howson, brought a complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Marshall (Building Contractors) Ltd. The hearing was held by CVP before Employment Judge JM Wade on 19 November 2021, with Ms McGee appearing for the claimant and Mr T Pochron for the respondent.
The tribunal held that the complaint succeeded in relation to an alleged deduction in respect of February 2021. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £176.21 for that deduction.
In all other respects, the claim was dismissed. The judgment does not record any further split of the award, additional remedy elements, or any discrimination or unfair dismissal findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint succeeded only in relation to an alleged deduction in respect of February 2021; in other respects the claim was dismissed. | Upheld | — | £176 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £176
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.