Case 1802609/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JP Woodhead v Specialist Computer Systems Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802609/2020
- Decision date
- 2 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JP Woodhead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 September 2020, the tribunal gave Mr JP Woodhead an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for having not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Wade therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on 2 October 2020. The judgment contains no substantive findings on the underlying merits and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case listing. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim; this claim type is taken from the case listing. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.