Case 1802618/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Ripley v Lakeside Dining Ltd t/a The Lakeside Café and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802618/2020
- Decision date
- 17 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss C Ripley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing heard on 17 July 2020 before Employment Judge D N Jones, with Miss C Ripley represented by Mr B Palmer and the respondents represented by Ms E Cousins. The judgment identifies the claimant and the two respondents, Lakeside Dining Ltd t/a The Lakeside Café and Lakeside Holdings (Roundhay) Limited.
The only substantive disposal recorded is that the claims against the second respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not identify the nature of the withdrawn claims, does not record any findings on liability, and does not set out any remedy or award.
No further conclusions are stated in the extracted judgment beyond the procedural dismissal of the claims against the second respondent. There are no recorded legal tests, no split of any monetary award, and no findings concerning the first respondent in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The record states: 'The claims against the second respondent are dismissed upon withdrawal.' The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type or make any substantive findings on liability. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.