Case 1802630/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Manton v Next Distribution Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802630/2020
- Decision date
- 15 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Venue
- Leeds This was a remote hearing
- Panel members
- Ms B Hillon, Mr D Dorman-Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Manton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case remotely by CVP video link at Leeds on 14 and 15 January 2021. The claimant was represented by his wife and the respondent was represented by Mr Ho.
The unanimous judgment was that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The disability discrimination claim was also not well founded and was dismissed.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the relevant time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed; written reasons are not included because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of disability discrimination was not well founded and was dismissed; written reasons are not included because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.