Case 1802633/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Scott v North Star Investment Management Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802633/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jaleel Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that North Star Investment Management Limited had made unlawful deductions from Mr D Scott’s wages. It held that all wages due for January and February 2023 had not been paid, and that this constituted an unlawful deduction from wages.
The claim succeeded in full, and the respondent was ordered to pay Mr Scott £9,500.00 as the total gross sum in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. No separate element of the award was identified for interest or other compensation in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages by not paying all wages due in January and February 2023. The order was for £9,500.00, described as the total gross sum in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £9,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.