Case 1802655/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Wiles v Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802655/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Wiles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Wiles brought a claim of unfair dismissal said to arise from an alleged dismissal on 29 November 2019. The tribunal held that she did not have the qualifying service required by section 108 ERA 1996 and therefore had no jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim, which was struck out.
The claimant also advanced a complaint described as breach of GDPR. The tribunal struck that complaint out because it disclosed no cause of action within the Employment Tribunal's jurisdiction. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because the claimant did not have the necessary qualifying service under section 108 ERA 1996, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The complaint of breach of GDPR was struck out on the ground that it disclosed no cause of action within the Employment Tribunal's jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.