Case 1802657/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Colley v Kevin D Gilmour Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802657/2020
- Decision date
- 30 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Colley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Maidment on 30 July 2020. The tribunal found that Miss J Colley had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her damages of £1,200.
The tribunal also found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,600. In addition, the respondent was ordered to pay £600 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment.
The judgment records no other issues or reasoning beyond those determinations. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was £5,400.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Redundancy | Found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
| Other | Award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide written statement of particulars of employment. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,400
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.