Case 1802661/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Williams v Blink Print Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802661/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was held by telephone at Leeds on 22 August 2022 before Employment Judge Martin. The claimant, Mr G Williams, appeared in person and the respondent, Blink Print Limited, was represented by Mrs M Peckham, solicitor. The tribunal recorded two complaints for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of sums of £45 and £108.90 described as expenses. Those sums had been paid, so the claimant withdrew those complaints and the judgment records them as dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant withdrew this complaint after the sums of £45 and £108.90 had been paid. The judgment's operative paragraph records the complaint as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons state that the claimant did not have the requisite period of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim and that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. The operative judgment paragraph states that the complaint was dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.