Case 1802669/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wilson v NG Bailey IT Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802669/2020
- Decision date
- 14 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rostant heard the case at Sheffield by CVP on 14 January 2020, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Draper, Solicitor. The written record states that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing, and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The written judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasoning, findings of fact, or any remedy because those reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record provided here.
The claimant's claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.