Case 1802670/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Keane v Linburg Coach Travel — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802670/2020
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Keane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued a strike out judgment in respect of the complaint of unfair dismissal. It recorded that the claim was being struck out for want of two years' service. Before doing so, the Tribunal sent a letter dated 17 June 2020 inviting the claimant to make representations or to request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, but the claimant did not respond.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims remained listed for hearing on 3 August 2020. No remedy was awarded in this strike out decision, and no other claim was finally determined in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 for want of two years' service. The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 17 June 2020 to make representations or request a hearing, but he did not respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.