Case 1802686/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K McIntosh v Ian Darley — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802686/2020
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K McIntosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 August 2020, the Tribunal gave Ms K McIntosh an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 3 July 2020 and because it was not being actively pursued. The claimant did not respond by the due date of 18 August 2020.
Employment Judge Lancaster therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 26 August 2020 did not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim(s) or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s). The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to respond by 18 August 2020 to the Tribunal's letter of 10 August 2020 seeking representations on non-compliance with the order dated 3 July 2020 and on the basis that the claim was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.