Case 1802692/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Q Basharat v Vanquis Bank plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802692/2022
- Decision date
- 24 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Q Basharat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Hull CVP hearing on 17 August 2022, Employment Judge Miller considered the respondent's application to strike out Mr Q Basharat's claim on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success. The written record identifies the parties' representatives and records that the decision was given orally at the hearing.
The application was refused. No merits finding on the underlying claim is set out in this short judgment, and no remedy is awarded. The record also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claim on the basis that it had no reasonable prospects of success. That application was refused; the underlying substantive claim is not determined in this decision. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.