Case 1802705/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Ms McAughtrie, operations manager — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802705/2023
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case by CVP on 12 July 2023 before Employment Judge JM Wade. The claimant, Mr RJ Padgett, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms McAughtrie, operations manager.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract were dismissed for the reasons announced to the parties. The extracted text does not include a written explanation of those reasons, and it states that written reasons were provided at the time of the judgment if requested.
No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses this complaint together with breach of contract for the reasons announced to the parties; the extracted text does not set out separate reasoning or any monetary award. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses this complaint together with unlawful deduction from wages for the reasons announced to the parties; the extracted text does not set out separate reasoning or any monetary award. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.