Case 1802722/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K. Margetts v A New Angle Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802722/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs K. Margetts
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K. Margetts brought a breach of contract complaint against A. New Angle Limited and Mrs L. Watson. The judgment records that the complaint against the First Respondent was well founded in respect of non-payment of employee pension contributions.
The Employment Judge ordered the First Respondent to pay the Claimant £596.30 forthwith. The judgment does not identify a separate breakdown of that sum into different heads of loss, and it records no additional remedy beyond that payment.
The complaint against the Second Respondent, Mrs L. Watson, was dismissed on withdrawal. No other findings, legal tests, or reasons are set out in the short judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint against the First Respondent was found well founded for non-payment of employee pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £596 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint against the Second Respondent, Mrs L Watson, was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £596
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.