Case 1802731/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Thurgood v Link Distribution (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802731/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Thurgood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds Employment Tribunal on 5 July 2021, before Employment Judge Buckley sitting alone, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay and ordered Link Distribution (UK) Limited to pay £629.30 gross. The judgment records no separate breakdown of that sum beyond the notice pay claim itself.
The claimant's separate breach of contract claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for unpaid notice pay succeeded; tribunal ordered payment of £629.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £629 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £629
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.