Case 1802753/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v EMS Engineering Services Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802753/2021
- Decision date
- 26 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by EMS Engineering Services Ltd between 18 January 2021 and 10 February 2021. The tribunal found that under his contract he was entitled to be paid £692.30 per week.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions of £1,107.68 by failing to pay wages for the period 1 to 10 February 2021, and ordered payment of that sum. It also found that the respondent failed to pay holiday pay due on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and ordered payment of £254.91.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unauthorised deductions by failing to pay wages for 1 to 10 February 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,108 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment found holiday pay was due on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £255 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,363
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.