Case 1802768/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Veea Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802768/2021
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Tobias Callum Rawcliffe, was employed by Veea Group Ltd under a letter dated 18 September 2020 that the tribunal treated as a statement of particulars of employment. The agreed terms included salary of £40,000 per annum, 32 days' annual leave and, after 12 weeks, four weeks' notice to terminate. The tribunal did not make any finding of failure to supply a written statement because the offer letter itself recorded the contractual terms.
On wages and holiday pay, the tribunal found that during the employment the claimant received only £4,261.50 on 13 November 2020 and no other payments, despite working until he resigned on 29 January 2021. The claimant had accrued 8 days' holiday but accepted that he had taken 5 days, so he was owed 3 days' unpaid holiday. Mr Lavery, for the respondent, conceded that in the absence of a written agreement permitting withholding of pay the respondent was not legally entitled to withhold the claimant's wages and that judgment should be entered for £7,007.50 net for unpaid wages and £355.80 net for holiday pay.
For notice pay, the tribunal found that the claimant had agreed in writing on 4 February 2021 to forgo notice and notice pay only if his outstanding salary was paid. That condition was not met, and the claimant had otherwise been willing to work, so the respondent's failure to pay him in lieu of notice was a breach of contract. The tribunal held that he was entitled to four weeks' notice at a weekly gross rate of £769.23, but reduced the damages to reflect alternative employment and awarded £1,376.92 gross. The total award was £8,740.22.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages awarded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent conceded there was no written agreement permitting withholding of pay and accepted the outstanding wages figure of £7,007.50 net. | Upheld | — | £7,008 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was limited to 3 days because the claimant conceded he had taken 5 of the 8 days accrued during employment. The award was £355.80 net. | Upheld | — | £356 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was awarded as damages for breach of contract. The claimant's written agreement to forgo notice was conditional on payment of outstanding salary, which was not fulfilled, and the tribunal reduced the award for mitigation by alternative employment. | Upheld | — | £1,377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,740
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.