Case 1802854/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Alderson v Clear My Credit Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802854/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Alderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Alderson brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Clear My Credit Ltd. The tribunal identified that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have at least two years' service in order to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant could not show that she had two years' service and had not shown cause why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. On that basis, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out.
The judgment was a short strike out decision dated 16 June 2020 and did not record any monetary award, liability finding on the merits of dismissal, or any separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 because the claimant could not show two years' service and did not show cause why the claim should not be struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.