Case 1802860/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Gale v Northern Life Care Limited t/a UBU — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802860/2021
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr M Brewer, Ms VM Griggs
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Gale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Leeds on 16-18 August 2022 before Employment Judge Maidment, with members Mr M Brewer and Ms VM Griggs, the tribunal dealt with the claimant’s complaints against Northern Life Care Limited t/a UBU. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The claimant’s complaints of disability discrimination were dismissed upon her withdrawal of them. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of those discrimination complaints in the extracted text.
The claimant’s complaint of ordinary and automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. No remedy, award, or monetary breakdown is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaints of disability discrimination were dismissed upon her withdrawal of them. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant’s complaint of ordinary and automatic unfair dismissal failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.