Case 1802877/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Broomfield v DPA Fletcher (Builders) Limited AT A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802877/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Broomfield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 20 November 2020, Employment Judge Lancaster considered the single issue in the case: whether Mr B Broomfield was working under a common law apprenticeship or a statutory apprenticeship. The claim was for damages for loss of earnings after the employment relationship ended in April 2020 and before the end of the alleged two-year apprenticeship term in September 2021. The tribunal recorded that there were no outstanding money claims for sums allegedly owing up to the date of termination.
The claimant relied on a term in the Order Form stating that the employer did not have the right to terminate the agreement early for convenience. The tribunal held that the agreement containing that wording was between the Leeds College of Building and the respondent, not between Mr Broomfield and the respondent, so he could not rely on it. The tribunal also said that the wording did not mean that the claimant's own employment contract could not be terminated early.
The tribunal found that the arrangement was a statutory apprenticeship. It referred to the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009 and said that such an apprenticeship has the status of a contract of service and is to be treated as not being a contract of apprenticeship. On that basis, the contract could be terminated on proper notice, which in this case was done on the grounds of redundancy.
The tribunal concluded that the claim was based on a misunderstanding of the document relied on and had no reasonable prospect of success, so it was struck out. The final hearing listed for 18 January 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal struck out the claim because it considered the claim to have no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.