Case 1802877/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Kozlow v Cue Gardens Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802877/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Kozlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr T Kozlow was disabled by reason of anxiety disorder as at 26 March 2022. It also recorded that the case was heard by Employment Judge Miller on 26 September 2022, with no attendance by the respondent, and that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. The judge therefore proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Mr Kozlow's claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because he had less than two years' continuous service with Cue Gardens Ltd.
The claimant's claim that he was subjected to direct discrimination because of disability was allowed. The judgment does not set out a longer liability analysis, but it records the disability finding and the successful direct discrimination claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay a total of £16,175, made up of £6,175 compensation for loss of earnings and £10,000 compensation for injury to feelings. No separate award for the unfair dismissal claim was made, and the judgment does not record any interest award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim as the claimant had less than two years' continuous service with the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was disabled by reason of anxiety disorder as at 26 March 2022 and allowed the claim for direct discrimination because of disability. | Upheld | Disability | £16,175 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,175
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,175
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.