Case 1802887/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Fowler v University of Huddersfield FINAL HEARING Heard: BY CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802887/2020
- Decision date
- 15 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mrs L Anderson-Coe, Mr K Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Fowler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote final hearing by CVP before Employment Judge JM Wade sitting with Mrs L Anderson-Coe and Mr K Smith on 12 to 15 April 2021. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his Equality Act and unfair dismissal complaints before the Tribunal on 15 April 2021. On that basis, the Tribunal dismissed the complaints. No findings of fact, liability conclusions, or remedy awards are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his Equality Act complaints before the Tribunal gave judgment. The specific age discrimination label is taken from the case context. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his Equality Act complaints before the Tribunal gave judgment. The specific disability discrimination label is taken from the case context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant withdrew his unfair dismissal complaint before the Tribunal gave judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.