Case 1802891/2021 · Employment Tribunal
C Aspinall v Panoramic Group Ltd. AT A HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802891/2021
- Decision date
- 28 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Aspinall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds by CVP on 28 July 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant, C Aspinall, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the claims for notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of wages were all presented outside the 3 month time limit, and that it was not reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time. Those claims were therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis it ordered Panoramic Group Ltd to pay a redundancy payment of £1,620. The figure was calculated by reference to 3 years' continuous employment, all of which was over the age of 41, giving entitlement to 4.5 weeks' pay at £360 per week.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was presented outside the 3 month time limit, when it would have been reasonably practicable to present it in time, and was dismissed because the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was presented outside the 3 month time limit, when it would have been reasonably practicable to present it in time, and was dismissed because the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The arrears of wages claim was presented outside the 3 month time limit, when it would have been reasonably practicable to present it in time, and was dismissed because the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £1,620, calculated on the basis of 3 years' continuous employment, all of which was over age 41, entitling him to 4.5 weeks' pay at £360 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,620 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,620
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.