Case 1802936/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Chambers v Burtech Precision Ltd and 5 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802936/2022
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
7 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Z Chambers brought a breach of contract claim against Burtech Precision Limited. Employment Judge Miller found that claim successful and ordered Burtech Precision Limited to pay £9,043.72 in damages for breach of contract. The judgment states that Burtech Precision Limited was identified as both the first and second respondent.
The claims against Burtech Engineering Limited, K. L. Burnett Limited, Burtech Precision Engineering Limited and G. N. Burnett Limited were dismissed. Those respondents’ applications for preparation time orders against the claimant were refused.
The tribunal also granted the claimant’s application for a preparation time order and ordered Burtech Precision Limited to pay £1,344 for his costs of preparing for the hearing. The judgment does not set out any separate interest figure or other remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract claim against Burtech Precision Limited successful and awarded £9,043.72 as damages. | Upheld | — | £9,044 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,388
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,044
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.