Case 1802958/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Petraviciute v Supreme Aesthetics Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802958/2022
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss V Petraviciute, pursued two unlawful deduction from wages claims. The tribunal recorded that the respondent admitted the May 2022 deduction of £660. It separately considered an April 2022 claim for £432, said to represent 36 unpaid hours at £12 per hour. In assessing that claim, the tribunal compared the claimant's written record, an electronic notebook record, and the claim itself, and noted the respondent had produced no evidence showing the claimant's figures were invented or invalid.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that her hours were irregular and could exceed the 16 hours per week stated in her contract. It found that the April 2022 figures were wages and that, because they had not been paid, they were unlawfully deducted from wages. Judgment was therefore entered for £432 on the April claim and £660 by consent on the admitted May claim, making a total award of £1,092.
The claims for holiday pay and for 'other payments' were not proceeded with and were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment also records that there had been an unfair dismissal claim, but that claim had been struck out previously and was not determined at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted the May 2022 deduction and judgment was entered by consent. | Upheld | — | £660 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's April 2022 records and found 36 hours at £12 per hour had not been paid. | Upheld | — | £432 |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that this claim had been struck out previously. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,092
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.