Case 1802963/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Petch v Elle Brown t/a The Fox — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802963/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Petch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss S Petch, did not attend the hearing and was not represented. The tribunal noted that it had made such enquiries of her as were practicable, including telephoning the mobile telephone number cited in her claim form, and considered the information available to it.
On that basis, Employment Judge Brain gave judgment that the claimant's claims failed and stand dismissed. The judgment does not set out separate reasoning for each claim or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separately address this claim; it states that the claimant's claims failed and stand dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not separately address this claim; it states that the claimant's claims failed and stand dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately address this claim; it states that the claimant's claims failed and stand dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.