Case 1802983/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Ronoh v NHS Professionals Limited AT A HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 1802983/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- VM Griggs, IW Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Ronoh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP video conferencing on 22, 23 and 24 April 2025 before Employment Judge Lancaster with lay members VM Griggs and IW Taylor. The claimant, Mr B Ronoh, appeared in person and the respondent, NHS Professionals Limited, was represented by Ms Jaimie Whiteley, solicitor advocate.
The tribunal's unanimous decision was that the claim was dismissed. The written record does not set out the oral reasons given at the hearing, and it records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written decision.
No monetary award was made and no separate remedy figures are recorded in the written judgment. The public record therefore contains only the final outcome and the procedural note that reasons were delivered orally.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The written judgment does not set out the pleaded causes of action. This classification is inferred from the gov.uk listing category 'Public Interest Disclosure' and the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.