Case 1802984/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Benton v Motorscrubber Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802984/2020
- Decision date
- 10 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Benton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss E Benton's complaint of unfair dismissal. It did so after a letter dated 09/07/2020 gave her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) stayed listed for hearing on 18/08/2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the complaint under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 09/07/2020 to make representations or request a hearing. It recorded that she failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.