Case 1802985/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Crossland v Abbey Education and Care Limited HELD by Cloud Video Platform (CVP) (Leeds) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802985/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Crossland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 26 October 2022, Employment Judge Shulman heard the case by CVP with Mrs R Crossland appearing in person from New York and the respondent absent and unrepresented. The tribunal recorded that it had been told the day before that the respondent was likely to go into liquidation, but found that it was not in liquidation and remained active on the Companies House register. Because the respondent did not attend, the tribunal found that it failed to discharge the onus of proving the reason for dismissal and entered judgment for unfair dismissal.
The claims for no redundancy pay and no notice pay were withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed on that basis. The tribunal then dealt with remedy for the unfair dismissal under the Recoupment Regulations.
For remedy, the tribunal used a gross weekly pay figure of £426.92 and 15 years' service to calculate a basic award of £9,605.70. It assessed the compensatory award at £9,599.98 for 26 weeks from 19 May 2022, the dismissal date, to 18 November 2022. In explaining that loss, the tribunal noted that the claimant was unwell until mid-July 2022, then looked for work after disclosure of the dismissal but did not obtain any, started fostering by 28 August 2022 without payment, and said she was unlikely to work again.
The tribunal also awarded £500 for loss of statutory industrial rights. The total award was £19,705.68, of which the prescribed element was £9,599.98 and the balance was £10,105.70.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Respondent did not attend or appear represented. The tribunal found it had failed to discharge the onus of proving the reason for dismissal. Remedy comprised a basic award of £9,605.70, a compensatory award of £9,599.98, and £500 for loss of statutory industrial rights. | Upheld | — | £19,706 |
| Redundancy | Recorded in the judgment as a claim of no redundancy pay dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded in the judgment as a claim of no notice pay dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,706
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,606
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,600
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.