Case 1802998/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v M & G Olympic Products Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802998/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Davies decided the case on 17 October 2022 without attendance from either party. The tribunal made a determination on the papers from the extracted judgment and recorded its decision in a short Rule 21 judgment dated 7 November 2022.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to 1 week's holiday and ordered payment of £639.60 gross. It did not uphold the separate claim for unpaid wages for the period the claimant was laid off, because the respondent was found to be contractually entitled to lay the claimant off without wages.
The tribunal also held that the claimant was dismissed without notice in breach of contract and awarded damages in lieu of 7 weeks' notice of £4,473.00, calculated using the claimant's gross pay. It further found a breach of contract because pension contributions were deducted from wages but not paid into the claimant's pension, and awarded £1,200.00 for that breach.
On redundancy, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,995.50. It also upheld a claim for a guarantee payment in the sum of £150.00. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £12,458.10.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 1 week's holiday; judgment described this as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £640 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages during lay-off. The tribunal found the respondent was contractually entitled to lay the claimant off without wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal without notice; damages in lieu of 7 weeks' notice calculated on gross pay. | Upheld | — | £4,473 |
| Breach of contract | Deducted pension contributions were not paid into the claimant's pension. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,996 |
| Other | Claim for a guarantee payment. | Upheld | — | £150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,458
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.