Case 1803001/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Pawson v Contract Furniture Manufacturing Limited AT A HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803001/2019
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Pawson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 2 December 2019 before Employment Judge Lancaster, the claimant was represented by Mr D Flood and the respondent by Ms L Bairstow. The written judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
Because the claims were withdrawn, the tribunal did not determine the merits of the breach of contract, protective award, redundancy, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, or working time claims. The respondent's application for costs was refused. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | This entry reflects the listed protective award issue. The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal; no merits findings were made on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.